Home The Theology of the Body Resources Articles Essays Links Email
GENERAL AUDIENCE OF WEDNESDAY, 19 JANUARY 1983
At the general audience of Wednesday, 19 January, held in the Paul VI Hall, Pope John Paul delivered the following address.
1. The texts of the prophets have great importance for understanding marriage
as a covenant of persons (in the likeness of the covenant of Yahweh with Israel)
and, in particular, for understanding the sacramental covenant of man and woman
in the dimension of sign. As already considered, the language of the body enters
into the integral structure of the sacramental sign whose principal subject is
man, male and female. The words of matrimonial consent constitute this sign,
because the spousal significance of the body in its masculinity and femininity
is found expressed in them. Such a significance is expressed especially by the
words: "I take you as my wife...my husband." Moreover, the essential
"truth" of the language of the body is confirmed with these words. The
essential "non-truth," the falsity of the language of the body is also
excluded (at least indirectly, implicitly). The body speaks the truth
through conjugal love, fidelity and integrity, just as non-truth, that is,
falsity, is expressed by all that is the negation of conjugal love, fidelity and
integrity. It can then be said that in the moment of pronouncing the words of
matrimonial consent, the newlyweds set themselves on the line of the same "prophetism
of the body," of which the ancient prophets were the mouthpiece. Expressed
by the ministers of marriage as a sacrament of the Church, the language of the
body institutes the visible sign itself of the covenant and of grace which,
going back to its origin to the mystery of creation, is continually sustained by
the power of the redemption of the body, offered by Christ to the Church.
Perform act of prophetic character
2. According to the prophetic texts the human body speaks a language which it
is not the author of. Its author is man who, as male and female, husband
and wife, correctly rereads the significance of this language. He rereads that
spousal significance of the body as integrally inscribed in the structure of the
masculinity or femininity of the personal subject. A correct rereading "in
truth" is an indispensable condition to proclaim this truth, that is, to
institute the visible sign of marriage as a sacrament. The spouses proclaim
precisely this language of the body, reread in truth, as the content and
principle of their new life in Christ and in the Church. On the basis of the
"prophetism of the body," the ministers of the sacrament of marriage perform
an act of prophetic character. They confirm in this way their participation
in the prophetic mission of the Church received from Christ. A prophet is one
who expresses in human words the truth coming from God, who speaks this truth in
the place of God, in his name and in a certain sense with his authority.
Matrimonial consent
3. All this applies to the newlyweds who, as ministers of the sacrament of
marriage, institute the visible sign by the words of matrimonial consent. They
proclaim the language of the body, reread in truth, as content and principle of
their new life in Christ and in the Church. This prophetic proclamation
has a complex character. The matrimonial consent is at the same time the
announcement and the cause of the fact that, from now on, both will be husband
and wife before the Church and society. (We understand such an announcement as
an indication in the ordinary sense of the term.) However, marriage consent has
especially the character of a reciprocal profession of the newlyweds made
before God. It is enough to examine the text attentively to be convinced that
that prophetic proclamation of the language of the body, reread in truth, is
immediately and directly addressed to the "I" and the "you":
by the man to the woman and by her to him. The central position in the
matrimonial consent is held precisely by the words which indicate the personal
subject, the pronouns "I" and "you." Reread in the truth of
its spousal significance, the language of the body constitutes by means of the
words of the newlyweds the union-communion of the persons. If the matrimonial
consent has a prophetic character, if it is the proclamation of the truth
coming from God and, in a certain sense, the statement of this truth in
God's name, this is brought about especially in the dimension of the
inter-personal communion, and only indirectly "before" others and
"for" others.
Sacrament's visible sign
4. Against the background of the words spoken by the ministers of the
sacrament of marriage, there stands the enduring language of the body, which God
originated by creating man as male and female: a language which has been renewed
by Christ. This enduring language of the body carries within itself all the
richness and depth of the mystery, first of creation and then of redemption.
Bringing into being the visible sign of the sacrament by means of the words of
their matrimonial consent, the spouses express therein the language of the body
with all the profundity of the mystery of creation and of redemption. (The
liturgy of the sacrament of marriage offers a rich context of it.) Rereading the
language of the body in this way, the spouses enclose in the words of
matrimonial consent the subjective fullness of the profession which is
indispensable to bring about the sign proper to the sacrament. Not only this,
they also arrive in a certain sense at the sources from which that sign on each
occasion draws its prophetic eloquence and its sacramental power. One must not
forget that before being spoken by the lips of the spouses, who are the
ministers of marriage as a sacrament of the Church, the language of the body was
spoken by the word of the living God, beginning from Genesis, through the
prophets of the old covenant, until the author of the letter to the Ephesians.
Decision and choice
5. We use over and over again the expression "language of the
body," harking back to the prophetic texts. As we have already said, in
these texts the human body speaks a language which it is not the author of in
the proper sense of the term. The author is man, male and female, who rereads
the true sense of that language, bringing to light the spousal significance of
the body as integrally inscribed in the very structure of the masculinity and
femininity of the personal subject. This rereading "in truth" of the
language of the body already confers per se a prophetic character on the
words of the marriage consent, by means of which man and woman bring into being
the visible sign of marriage as a sacrament of the Church. However, these words
contain something more than a simple rereading in truth of that language spoken
of by the femininity and masculinity of the newlyweds in their reciprocal
relationships: "I take you as my wife...as my husband." The words of
matrimonial consent contain the intention, the decision and the choice. Both of
the spouses decide to act in conformity with the language of the body, reread in
truth. If man, male and female, is the author of that language, he is so
especially inasmuch as he wishes to confer, and does indeed confer, on his
behavior and on his actions a significance in conformity with the reread
eloquence of the truth of masculinity and femininity in the mutual conjugal
relationship.
Has lasting effect
6. In this sphere man is the cause of the actions which have per se clear-cut
meanings. He is then the cause of the actions and at the same time the author of
their significance. The sum total of those meanings constitutes in a certain
sense the ensemble of the language of the body, in which the spouses
decide to speak to each other as ministers of the sacrament of marriage. The
sign which they constitute by the words of matrimonial consent is not a mere
immediate and passing sign, but a sign looking to the future which produces a
lasting effect, namely, the marriage bond, one and indissoluble ("all the
days of my life," that is, until
death). In this perspective they should fulfill that sign of multiple content
offered by the conjugal and family communion of the persons and also of that
content which, originating from the language of the body, is continually reread
in truth. In this way the essential "truth" of the sign will remain
organically linked to the morality of matrimonial conduct. In this truth of the
sign and, later, in the morality of matrimonial conduct, the procreative
significance of the body is inserted with a view to the future—that
is, paternity and maternity, which we have previously treated. To the question:
"Are you willing to accept responsibly and with love the children that God
may give you and to educate them according to the law of Christ and of the
Church?"—the
man and the woman reply: "Yes."
Now we postpone to later meetings further detailed examinations of the matter.
Taken from: L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO - English Edition -- Reprinted with Permission -- Libreria Editrice Vaticana - The Holy See